Practical tools behind my E&S assessments
I build my own tools to make environmental and social reviews faster, more consistent and easier to trace back to evidence. The first one is now part of my daily advisory work.
Environment, Ethics, Economics
Environment, Ethics, Economics
I build my own tools to make environmental and social reviews faster, more consistent and easier to trace back to evidence. The first one is now part of my daily advisory work.
A tool I built for my own advisory work. It screens a project, reviews its documents against the IFC Performance Standards and the World Bank Group EHS Guidelines, and turns the findings into a practical action plan.
Clients receive the reports. The tool itself stays with me.

The same findings, written for two different audiences.

Sample risk snapshot (fictional demo, details blurred).
For lenders, investors and project owners. Project facts and location, environmental, social and legal compliance risks, other constraints, what to know upfront and the management priorities.

Sample community overview (fictional demo).
For community meetings and public consultation. The same findings explained without technical terms, with clear next steps and an invitation to share feedback.
Samples use a fictional demo project. Details are blurred to protect client information and the method behind the tool.
In my own work, a lot of time goes into compiling site notes, stakeholder records, baseline data and lender requirements. These tools are my attempt to bring that information into one structured workflow, so red flags appear earlier and assessments stay consistent.
Less time on data compilation and first drafts of reports.
The same structured criteria applied across assessments.
Findings linked to evidence and the relevant Performance Standard.
Risk screening and the IFC PS gap checklist now run inside the Rapid E&S Assessment. The other tools are planned and may change based on feedback.
Early screening of project sector, location and sensitivity to flag potential red flags and an indicative risk category.
A structured checklist across Performance Standards 1 to 8 to produce a simple gap table.
Turns identified gaps into actions with owners, deadlines and status.
A searchable log of field observations, photos and consultation records.
A light screen of material ESG topics for listed companies.
Structured first drafts of screening notes and gap tables, always reviewed by me before use.
Send me a short description of your project. I will explain what a rapid E&S assessment would cover, which documents I would need and what you would receive. Project information is kept confidential.